FACTORS FOR LOWER HIRING RATE OF PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES IN PUBLIC SECTOR COMPARED TO PRIVATE SECTOR

MP Gerald Giam

Mr Gerald Giam Yean Song asked the Prime Minister and Minister for Finance (a) what specific factors have contributed to the lower hiring rate of Persons with Disabilities (PwDs) in the public sector compared to the private sector; (b) how the hiring rate of PwDs in Singapore’s Public Service quantitatively compares with that in other developed countries; (c) what structural or policy-related constraints prevent Singapore Government agencies from increasing PwD hires; and (d) what steps are being taken to address these constraints directly.

The Minister for Education (Mr Chan Chun Sing) (for the Prime Minister): Mr Speaker, Sir, it is not meaningful to compare the hiring rate of persons with disabilities (PwDs) in the public and private sectors as the contexts and nature of jobs in the two sectors differ. The Government is focused on raising the overall employment rate of PwDs across both the public and private sectors, where PwDs are placed and retained in jobs that are best suited to their strengths and capabilities.

However, the public sector also has a significant proportion of roles for which a certain level of physical and mental fitness is required, such as the uniformed services. This is one reason why hiring rates of PwDs may differ across sectors. There is also no comparative data for the hiring rates of PwDs in the public sector across developed countries.

The hon Member also asked about the constraints of hiring PwDs and steps taken to address these constraints. The Member may refer to the responses to the Parliamentary Question (PQ) that he raised on 15 October, and the PQ raised by the Member, Mr Don Wee, on 9 September, where we shared the public sector’s approach to the issue.

The public sector has been and will continue to support the employment of PwDs.

Mr Speaker: Mr Gerald Giam.

Mr Gerald Giam Yean Song (Aljunied): Mr Speaker, I thank the Minister for his reply. Sir, as of December 2023, the private sector had employed 75% more PwDs as a proportion of the total employment compared to the public sector. I understand that the Minister said that is not meaningful to compare. I would just like more clarification on why he thinks that is not meaningful, apart from the fact that the Singapore Armed Forces and the Home Team may not be able to hire as many PwDs in combat positions.

As the largest employer in Singapore, does the Minister agree that the Government bears a greater responsibility to set a positive hiring example in inclusive hiring? Ideally, the public sector should lead the hiring of PwDs, rather than lagging behind.

Secondly, could the Minister share if there are concrete targets for PwD employment in the public sector over the next five years and, if so, what strategies are in place to ensure that these targets are achieved?

Mr Chan Chun Sing: Mr Speaker, Sir, I have already explained that the nature of jobs in the public sector is quite different from the nature of jobs in the private sector. For us, it is more important to make sure that instead of counting the number of jobs, it is to make every job count. And that is what the Public Service sector is prepared and is committed to do.

We want to make sure that every PwD employed by the Public Service sector has a meaningful job, based on their capabilities and strengths, and we will continue to look out for jobs where we can meaningfully employ PwDs to best make use of their talents. We are not here just to meet the numbers. And I think all my agencies are trying their best to make sure that they can convert jobs that are relevant and meaningful for us to hire PwDs.

I have said that there are many jobs in the Public Service sector that are not comparable with the jobs in the private sector, and it is not meaningful for us to make that comparison.

Prime Minister’s Office
13 November 2024

https://sprs.parl.gov.sg/search/#/sprs3topic?reportid=oral-answer-3732